Looking for a Protectt.ai Alternative?
Certified RASP.
Not the Full Picture.
Protectt.ai ships certified RASP and trust scoring for Indian BFSI. NonaShield includes RASP as one of nine layers, plus device fingerprinting, agentic AI investigation, and hardware-backed cryptographic evidence — one console instead of a dedicated RASP point solution.
Trust Scoring Isn't the Same as Device Identity.
Protectt.ai's own site documents 100+ runtime security controls, code obfuscation, proprietary device/SIM binding (LSAP/SSiD), and an AI-driven Trust Scoring mechanism, with ISO 27001, PCI DSS, ISO 22301 and ISO 42001 certifications and RBI/SEBI/NPCI framework alignment. What isn't publicly documented: device fingerprinting, agentic AI investigation, or hardware-backed cryptographic evidence — proprietary device/SIM binding is a different mechanism from a hardware-rooted, cryptographically signed identity.
Source: protectt.ai/feeds/service/rasp →What Each Actually Covers.
| Capability | NonaShield | Protectt.ai |
|---|---|---|
| RASP / Runtime Self-Protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fraud & Graph Risk Engine | ✓ | ✓ |
| Device Fingerprinting / ID | ✓ | Partial (device/SIM binding) |
| Behavioural Intelligence | ✓ | Behavioural fraud rules, not biometrics specifically |
| Agentic AI for Fraud Investigation | ✓ | — |
| Hardware-Backed Cryptography | ✓ | — |
| Immutable Evidence (Hash-Chained) | ✓ | — |
✓ = documented on the vendor's own site · Amber = adjacent capability with a documented gap · — = not publicly documented, checked against protectt.ai as of the date this page was written.
Should You Actually Switch?
You need device fingerprinting and hardware-backed cryptographic evidence alongside RASP and trust scoring — not device/SIM binding as the only identity mechanism.
You need certified RASP plus basic trust scoring and device binding for Indian BFSI compliance, and don't need device fingerprinting or hardware-backed cryptographic evidence.
Comparing more vendors? See the best Protectt.ai alternatives in 2026.
Questions to ask when comparing NonaShield and Protectt.ai
A fair comparison starts with the job you need done. Use these questions with any vendor, including us.
- Does it protect the app at runtime, or only before release?
- Is the device identified by a hardware-backed key, or by a stored ID?
- Who makes the fraud decision, and can you see why it was made?
- Is there signed evidence you can hand to a regulator or use in a dispute?
- What does it cost with every feature you need switched on?
- Can you pilot it beside your current tool and compare results?
Cost and effort
NonaShield is a flat $599 a month (about ₹6 lakh a year) and includes RASP, device fingerprinting, identity and evidence. When you compare with Protectt.ai, add up every product you would need to cover the same ground, plus the integration and operations time for each. See the RASP pricing page.
Moving over
- Run NonaShield beside Protectt.ai on a small share of traffic.
- Compare detections, false positives and time to integrate.
- Move the flows where fraud decisioning matters most first.
- Retire overlapping tools once the results are clear.
Related reading: full comparison, how to choose mobile RASP and build vs buy.
One SDK, With Evidence for the Regulator.
NonaShield is a single SDK integration — RASP and trust scoring come with hardware-backed device identity and signed evidence already attached. Talk to us about your current setup and we'll walk through what moves over.
Talk to Us →