Looking for a Fingerprint (fingerprint.com) Alternative?
An ID Signal
Isn't a Fraud Platform.
Fingerprint (fingerprint.com) ships a strong visitor/device identification API. NonaShield includes that layer of identity, plus RASP, behavioural risk, agentic AI investigation, and hardware-backed evidence — a full fraud platform, not just a signal.
An Identity Signal Is a Starting Point, Not the Whole Stack.
Fingerprint's own site documents persistent Visitor IDs, 20+ Smart Signals (bot, VPN, incognito, tamper detection) and a Suspect Score risk value, processing 80M+ events daily across web and mobile SDKs. What isn't publicly documented: RASP, behavioural biometrics, agentic AI investigation, or hardware-backed cryptography — so teams using Fingerprint alone for mobile fraud typically still need a separate RASP and evidence layer.
Source: fingerprint.com/products/fingerprint-pro →What Each Actually Covers.
| Capability | NonaShield | Fingerprint |
|---|---|---|
| Device Fingerprinting / ID | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fraud & Graph Risk Engine | ✓ | Suspect Score (signal-based) |
| RASP / Runtime Self-Protection | ✓ | — |
| Behavioural Intelligence | ✓ | — |
| Agentic AI for Fraud Investigation | ✓ | — |
| Hardware-Backed Cryptography | ✓ | — |
| Immutable Evidence (Hash-Chained) | ✓ | — |
✓ = documented on the vendor's own site · Amber = adjacent capability with a documented gap · — = not publicly documented, checked against fingerprint.com as of the date this page was written.
Should You Actually Switch?
You need active runtime protection (RASP) and tamper-proof evidence alongside identity — not just a visitor/device ID signal feeding your own risk logic.
You need a lightweight, developer-friendly visitor/device ID signal across web and mobile, and you're building your own fraud logic around it without needing runtime app protection.
Questions to ask when comparing NonaShield and Fingerprint.com
A fair comparison starts with the job you need done. Use these questions with any vendor, including us.
- Does it protect the app at runtime, or only before release?
- Is the device identified by a hardware-backed key, or by a stored ID?
- Who makes the fraud decision, and can you see why it was made?
- Is there signed evidence you can hand to a regulator or use in a dispute?
- What does it cost with every feature you need switched on?
- Can you pilot it beside your current tool and compare results?
Cost and effort
NonaShield is a flat $599 a month (about ₹6 lakh a year) and includes RASP, device fingerprinting, identity and evidence. When you compare with Fingerprint.com, add up every product you would need to cover the same ground, plus the integration and operations time for each. See the RASP pricing page.
Moving over
- Run NonaShield beside Fingerprint.com on a small share of traffic.
- Compare detections, false positives and time to integrate.
- Move the flows where fraud decisioning matters most first.
- Retire overlapping tools once the results are clear.
Related reading: full comparison, how to choose mobile RASP and build vs buy.
One SDK, From Identity to Evidence.
NonaShield is a single SDK integration — device identity is just the first layer, with RASP, risk scoring and signed evidence already built in. Talk to us about your current setup and we'll walk through what moves over.
Talk to Us →